Game Of Thrones Suffers Leak

An up and coming scene of HBO's hit TV indicate 'Round of Thrones' has been spilled before its booked debut. It is the second affirmed spill in two weeks to hit season seven. 

As per the creation organization HBO, the scene was erroneously made accessible on its gushing stages in Spain, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland. 

Tom Nielsen, a representative for HBO Europe, purportedly stated, "We have discovered that the forthcoming scene of Game of Thrones was incidentally posted for a short time on the HBO Nordic and HBO Espaã±a stages. The blunder seems to host began with a third get-together merchant and the scene was expelled when it was perceived." 

The debut of scene six is expected on Sunday. According to reports, the scene seemed to have duplicated and shared online on different locales early Wednesday. 

Prior, an alternate scene of "Session of Thrones" was spilled on August 3, preceding its planned discharge on August 7. The break was ascribed to a robbery by laborers of Prime Focus Technologies, the information dealing with firm of Star India, which has the rights to air the arrangement in the nation. 

In late July, HBO encountered a monstrous cyberattack, with which unknown programmers claim to have taken 1.5 terabytes of information and undermining to discharge more stolen material if their payoff requests are not met. In late July, HBO, claimed by Time Warner, said that the organization was exploring the hack. 

Nonetheless, the prior break or the programmer disturbances did not hurt the show's appraisals or supporter numbers, reports said. 

HBO expressed that more than 16 million watchers tuned in for the season debut in July of the dream arrangement, which is a standout amongst the most well known shows on TV.

By: muhammad umar On 02:14

Continue Reading

HBO Investigating Hack of Its Twitter Accounts

By ALEX JOHNSON 

HBO said Wednesday night that it was researching the hacking of a few of the link channel's Twitter accounts, which came as the organization is endeavoring to make sense of how scenes of its megahit arrangement "Round of Thrones" and different materials were released on the web. 

The records of a few HBO arrangement, including "A week ago Tonight with John Oliver," "Genuine Blood," "Veep" and "Vinyl," tweeted a message Wednesday night indicating to be from the infamous OurMine programmers. It gave the idea that exclusive U.S.- based records were influenced — @HBOUK and @HBOCanada seemed to rise unscathed, for instance. 

HBO recaptured control of the records inside around 40 minutes and erased the tweets, which NBC News filed before they were brought down: 

HBO disclosed to NBC News late Wednesday just that "we are exploring." 

OurMine, in some cases called OurMine Team, has been rebuked for assuming control web-based social networking and other online records of a few conspicuous individuals and foundations over the most recent 2½ years or thereabouts, including those of Google Chief Executive Sundar Pichai, Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg, Wikipedia fellow benefactor Jimmy Wales, BuzzFeed and TechCrunch. Large portions of the messages reflected those that were posted Wednesday night 

OurMine is mysterious, and it couldn't be resolved Wednesday night whether it was, indeed, behind the HBO hack. In all of Wednesday night's tweets, the name "OurMine" was rendered with swoon emphasize marks — as "Our⁻Mi⁻ne," not "OurMine" — a development that the programmers aren't known to have utilized some time recently. 

HBO said it didn't have enough data to talk about that. 

In October 2016, BuzzFeed posted a story connecting OurMine Team to a young Saudi programmer. BuzzFeed was hacked the following day, with an article showing up on the site obviously posted by OurMine.

By: muhammad umar On 02:11

Continue Reading

Earn 15 satoshi per captcha with no time limit

• Easy to using.
• Just complete captcha and earn.
• Payout in 1 sec
• Payout instant to Faucethub

Signup link for faucethub given below:

http://faucethub.io/r/9274339

SignUp link for wallrewards given below:

http://wallrewards.com/?ref=ALqWYdcnyb

                    [ How It Work ]

1. Sign up account at faucethub account with your bitcoin address
2. Sign Up account Wallrewards with your bitcoin address(same with address register in faucethub.io)
3. Go to Work Menu and click Start Button
4. App will copy XRB address and open claim page*
5. Paste copied XRB address into XRB account input
6. Start Claim**

* After Pause claim more than 5 minutes. You need refresh Working menu and take new XRB address(address could be changed)
** The Point(satoshi) will added in your balance every 1-2 minutes 

By: muhammad umar On 12:27

Continue Reading

Live Cricket Score, Rising Pune Supergiant vs Gujarat Lions, IPL 2017: Dhoni, Stokes key for RPS

Rising Pune Supergiant are 72/4 against Gujarat Lions in their IPL 2017 encounter. Ben Stokes scored his half century after Pradeep Sangwann and Basil Thampi got rid of the RPS top order cheaply. Batting first, GL were bundled out for 161 after Imran Tahir and Jaydev Unadkat both took three wickets for RPS. Get live cricket score of Rising Pune Supergiant vs Gujarat Lions here.

Ben Stokes scored his second Indian Premier League (IPL) fifty after Pradeep Sangwan and Basil Thampi provided a brilliant start to Gujarat Lions with their quick wickets against Rising Pune Supergiant. Earlier, Imran Tahir and Jaydev Unadkat took three wickets each as Gujarat Lions were bowled out for 161 against Rising Pune Supergiant in their IPL 2017 encounter. Shardul Thakur and Dan Christian contributed with one each. Ishan Kishan and Brendon McCullum stitched together a 50-run stand for GL, but no other batsman was able to score big. Follow live cricket score of Rising Pune Supergiant vs Gujarat Lions, IPL 2017 here.

22:46 hrs IST: FIFTY! Second half century for Ben Stokes! RPS 73/4

22:42 hrs IST: 10 overs gone. Ben Stokes (46*) have taken RPS to 67/4 in 10 overs.

22:40 hrs IST: Consecutive sixes for Ben Stokes ! RPS 64/4

22:36 hrs IST: Cautious play by Ben Stokes and MS Dhoni. RPS 52/4 after 9 overs.

22:33 hrs IST: First boundary for MS Dhoni! RPS 51/4

22:29 hrs IST: Ankit Soni is the new bowler for Gujarat Lions. RPS 46/4

22:25 hrs IST: 6 overs gone. Rising Pune Supergiant are struggling on 43 for the loss of 4 wickets.

22:23 hrs IST: OUT! Fourth wicket goes down for RPS as Rahul Tripathi is run out for 6. RPS 42/4

22:20 hrs IST: It was short from Sangwan and Rahul Tripathi made no mistake in guiding it to the boundary. RPS 37/3

22:18 hrs IST: SIX! A maximum from Ben Stokes as RPS fight back. RPS 32/3

22:17 hrs IST: 4 overs gone. Rising Pune Supergiant are 25 for the loss of 3 wickets.

22:13 hrs IST: Another boundary for Ben Stokes. RPS 21/3

22:09 hrs IST: Elegant shot by Ben Stokes and he gets a boundary straight down the wicket. RPS 15/3

22:07 hrs IST: Horrible start for Rising Pune Supergiant as they are 11/3 after 2 overs.

22:04 hrs IST: OUT! Manoj TIwary departs for a duck as he was caught LBW by Basil Thampi. RPS 10/3

22:01 hrs IST: OUT! Another wicket for Pradeep Sangwan as RPS lose their skipper Steve Smith. RPS 8/2

22:00 hrs IST: Steve Smith is the new batsman for RPS and he gets a boundary straight away. RPS 8/1

21:58 hrs IST: OUT! Huge wicket for RPS as Pradeep Sangwan traps Rahane LBW for 4. RPS 4/1

21:55 hrs IST: Ajinkya Rahane and Rahul Tripathi to open the innings for Rising Pune Supergiant.

21:41 hrs IST: OUT! Jaydev Unadkat finishes it off for RPS as he castles Ankit Soni for a duck. GL all out for 161.

21:40 hrs IST: OUT! A direct hit from MS Dhoni and that’s the end of Dinesh Karthik for 29. GL 161/9

21:38 hrs IST: FOUR! A reverse sweep from Dinesh Karthik! GL 160/8

21:35 hrs IST: Finally a boundary for Dinesh Karthik! GL 155/8

21:31 hrs IST: A loose shot from Pradeep Sangwan as he ends up giving an easy catch to Rahul Tripathi. GL 147/8

21:27 hrs IST: A smart catch by Steve Smith and that’s the end of James Faulkner. GL 146/7

21:23 hrs IST: After 17 overs, Gujarat Lions are 146 for the loss of 6 wickets. Good bowling display by the Rising Pune Supergiant bowlers.

21:19 hrs IST: 16 overs gone. Gujarat Lions are 140 for the loss of 6 wickets.

21:15 hrs IST: OUT! Ravindra Jadeja could not handle the short ball and Dan Christian dismisses him for 19. GL 135/6

21:13 hrs IST: Cautious batting by Jadeja and Karthik as they look to rebuild the Gujarat Lions innings. GL 133/5

21:09 hrs IST: Shardul Thakur strays in his line and it’s easy picking on the leg side for Jadeja. GL 128/5

21:06 hrs IST: Another boundary for Ravindra Jadeja as GL are 122 for the loss of 5 wickets.

21:03 hrs IST: With scores of 0,1,5,4,0 in his last 5 T20 innings Dwayne Smith has turned out to be a liability for Gujarat Lions this season. GL 117/5

20:59 hrs IST: OUT! Brendon McCullum looked to play a lofted shot, but was caught in the deep by Ajinkya Rahane for 45. GL 109/5

20:57 hrs IST: A stylish shot from Dinesh Karthik and the ball rushes through the point region for a boundary. GL 108/4

20:53 hrs IST: 100 comes up for Gujarat Lions in the11th over with McCullum batting on 44. GL 100/4

20:49 hrs IST: OUT! Dwayne Smith goes for a sweep but the ball beats his bat and rattles the stumps. GL 94/4

20:47 hrs IST: OUT! Aaron Finch misreads the googly completely and ends up giving an easy catch back to Imran Tahir. GL 94/3

20:45 hrs IST: What a hit from Aaron Finch! The ball travelled miles for his first six of the game. GL 92/2

20:44 hrs IST: A huge six for Brendon McCullum as he moves on to 38. GL 86/1

20:41 hrs IST: A clean hit from Aaron Finch as he gets his first boundary of the game. GL 80/1

20:38 hrs IST: OUT! Suresh Raina goes for a tough second run and a brilliant work from MS Dhoni results in his run out for 8. GL 71/2

20:34 hrs IST: Imran Tahir is currently the second most successful bowler in IPL 2017 with 16 wickets. GL 70/1

20:31 hrs IST: A solid shot from Brendon McCullum and the Kiwi gets his fourth boundary of the match. GL 65/1

20:28 hrs IST: Ishan Kishan was looking quite promising but a loose shot from the youngster and Washington Sundar made no mistake in taking the catch. GL 56/1

20:26 hrs IST: OUT! Big wicket for Rising Pune Supergiant as Ishan Kishan is caught off Imran Tahir for 31. GL 55/1

20:23 hrs IST: 50 comes up for Gujarat Lions in the 6th over with consecutive fours for Ishan Kishan. GL 55/0

20:20 hrs IST: SIX! A huge shot from McCullum and Gujarat Lions are off to a blinder. GL 45/0

20:18 hrs IST: McCullum joins the party as he slams a four through the point region. GL 39/0

20:15 hrs IST: Second six of the match for Ishan Kishan. GL 35/0 after 4 overs.

20:12 hrs IST: Before this match, McCullum had scored just 13 off 21 balls from left-arm quicks: Nehra, McClenaghan and Aravind. GL 24/0

20:09 hrs IST: The batsmen have been quite cautious till now. GL 16/0

20:07 hrs IST: Great start by the youngster as he conceded just one run in the over. GL 12/0

20:05 hrs IST: Washington Sundar to bowl the second over. GL 11/0

20:04 hrs IST: A fine touch by McCullum and the ball rushes to the third-man boundary. GL 11/0

20:03 hrs IST: A cracking shot by Brendon McCullum and he gets the first boundary of the match. GL 5/0

20:01 hrs IST: Jaydev Unadkat to bowl the first over for RPS while Ishan Kishan and Brendon McCullum are the openers for Gujarat Lions. GL 1/0

19:59 hrs IST: The match is underway!

19:54 hrs IST: Here’s the Gujarat Lions XI: I Kishan, B McCullum, S Raina, A Finch, Smith, D Karthik, Faulkner, Jadeja, Soni, Thampi, Sangwan.

19:48 hrs IST: A look at the Rising Pune Supergiant squad - Rahane, Tripathi, Smith, Tiwary, MS Dhoni, Stokes, Christian, W Sundar, Unadkat, S Thakur, Tahir .

19:45 hrs IST: Just one change for Gujarat Lions - Pradeep Sangwan comes in for Irfan Pathan.

19:43 hrs IST: Two changes for Rising Pune Supergiant - Ben Stokes comes in for Lockie Ferguson and Shardul Thakur replaces Deepak Chahar.

19:37 hrs IST: Rohit Sharma scored 56 off 37 balls as Mumbai Indians beat Royal Challengers Bangalore by 5 wickets in the first match of the day.

19:32 hrs IST: Rising Pune Supergiant opt to field first after winning the toss against Gujarat Lions.

19:30 hrs IST: Time for the toss! Follow live cricket score for this encounter here.

19:24 hrs IST: The first match of the day is going down to the wire as Mumbai Indians need 25 runs to win from 14 balls against Royal Challengers Bangalore. Follow the action

19:19 hrs IST: The absence of Andrew Tye will be a big blow for GL in this match as he was the wrecker-in-chief when these two teams met earlier in the competition. The Aussie pacer took five wickets to ensure the victory for Gujarat Lions and his injury could not have come at a worse time for his side.

19:13 hrs IST: Rising Pune Supergiant was quite dominant in their last match as they pummeled Royal Challengers Bangalore by 61 runs. Lockie Ferguson was their hero as he finished with figures of 2/7 from his four overs.

19:07 hrs IST: Gujarat Lions came extremely close to winning their last game against Mumbai Indians on Saturday but a brilliant performance by Jasprit Bumrah in the super over proved to be their downfall.

19:03 hrs IST: Gujarat Lions have a perfect record against Rising Pune Supergiant in the Indian Premier League. GL have won all three encounters between these two teams.

19:01 hrs IST: Welcome to the Indian Premier League (IPL) match between Rising Pune Supergiant and Gujarat Lions.

However, RPS will be starting the match as favourites thanks to their impressive form in the tournament. Skipper Steve Smith scored a 41-ball-45 on Saturday as they beat Royal Challengers Bangalore by 61 runs and that win took them to fourth spot on the points table.

On the other hand, Gujarat Lions have not enjoyed a good run of form in this year’s tournament and have managed to win just 3 out of their 9 matches.

They will also be missing the services of Aussie pacer Andrew Tye who injured his left shoulder while fielding on the boundary during their loss against Mumbai Indians on Saturday. Tye, who claimed a five-wicket haul, including a hattrick, on his IPL debut was the most successful bowler for his side this season.

By: muhammad umar On 10:30

Continue Reading

Hey Trump, This Is Why the Civil War Happened

I asked historians to respond to Trump's question: "Why was there a civil war?" Here's what they told me.

In an interview with conservative journalist Salena Zito airing on Sirius XM on Monday, Donald Trump, the president of the United States, asked: "Why was there the Civil War?" This was part of an extended riff on Andrew Jackson, who Trump loves and who Trump thinks could have stopped the Civil War had he been born a little later. According to Trump, "[Jackson] was really angry that he saw what was happening with regard to the Civil War, he said, 'There no reason for this.' People don't realize you know, the Civil War, if you think about it, why?"

This is a good question! To help Trump sort it out, I contacted eight historians and history teachers—people who have thought about it—and asked them Trump's question: "Why was there a civil war?"

Here are their responses:

Eric Foner, DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University: "Two societies based on different systems of labor had developed within our single political system, and the leaders of each believed that expansion into the West was essential for their society's prosperity. Abraham's Lincoln's election convinced Southern leaders that their region was fated to become a permanent minority, which would put its future prospects—based on slavery—in jeopardy and that therefore they should create their own nation, while Northerners were not willing to see the country broken up. The result was civil war."

Sarah, an eighth grade history teacher in New York City: "There was a civil war in the United States over the issue of the Southern states dependency on the labor of enslaved people, and the increasing unpopularity of that system in the Northern part of the United States. The Southern states had spent the decades preceding the outbreak of war attempting to secure their 'states' rights' to maintain and spread slavery as the country admitted new states, using tactics such as attempting to nullify federal law. The South in some ways viewed themselves as being exploited by Northern industrial power, while also fearing a severe blow to their economic and political power should slavery end. The election of Abraham Lincoln triggered the South to follow through on their threats of secession. Then they fired on Fort Sumter."

Jane Cranz, adjunct history professor at Tarrant County College and Weatherford College in Texas: "The answer is complicated and includes everything from slavery, economics, states' rights, and regionalism just to name a few reasons. There is no single cause for the Civil War."

Amanda Lanigan, a high school history teacher in Massachusetts: "What's most interesting to me about the causes of the Civil War are the parallels to today. You had a society in a state of political and social division of issues that allow for no compromise. Prior to the Civil War people were asked to compromise on issues of fundamental human rights, state power, and the very definition of humanity when dealing with the issue of slavery... Larger economic developments such as industrialization and increased concentration of wealth in the North and South also played a background role. The issue of slavery drew out background conflicts regarding states rights and the true founding principles of the US. When Lincoln was elected, the South largely felt they had lost their voice in government as NO southern states and cast a vote for him... Most historians agree that the Civil War was unavoidable, and certainly Andrew Jackson, who was hot-headed and stubborn would not have been the president to prevent it, as he essentially started a war just to gain territory using a blatant false flag."

Shauna Devine, assistant professor in the department of medical history at the Schulich School of Medicine at Western University: "The causes of the Civil War is one of the most debated questions in Civil War history. Lincoln noted in his second inaugural address that slavery was likely "somehow" involved in the cause of the war, and there is consensus among historians that slavery and freedom, more than any other issue divided the north and south—but that is only a starting point to begin asking questions about what that meant. In the historiography there are many interpretive schools—progressive, revisionists, fundamentalists, modernists, etc., that have variously looked at the role of slavery and states rights, economics (especially tariffs); politics the fall of the Whigs and rise of the Republican party; secession; race; souther sectionalism; northern unionism."

Stephanie McCurry, R. Gordon Hoxie Professor of American History at Columbia: "There was a Civil War because divisions in the country around the political economy and morality of slavery had become so profound that 11 slave states seceded rather than accept the legitimacy of a Republican (and explicitly anti-slavery) president. Political elites in the South were so wedded to property in persons—human enslavement—they risked war to perpetuate it."

Justin Cerenzia, history department chair and assistant dean of faculty at St. George's School in Rhode Island: "The chronology issues aside of mentioning Jackson in this context (Jackson was dead in 1845), the central debate that caused the war was over slavery. It shouldn't really be a debate at all. The increase of sectional tensions and the breakdown of federal-state relations and the evolving nature of political parties in the era and economics of the time, etc. etc. all relate back to the slavery issue. Particularly because this all led to war."

David Blight, professor of American history at Yale University: "He really said this about Jackson and the Civil War? All I can say to you is that from day one I have believed that Donald Trump's greatest threat to our society and to our democracy is not necessarily his authoritarianism, but his essential ignorance—of history, of policy, of political process, of the Constitution. Saying that if Jackson had been around we might not have had the Civil War is like saying that one strong, aggressive leader can shape, prevent, move history however they wish. This is simply a fifth-grade understanding of history or worse. And this comes from the president of the United States! Under normal circumstances if a real estate tycoon weighed in on the nature of American history from such ignorance and twisted understanding we would simply ignore or laugh at him. But since this man lives in the historic White House and wields the constitutional powers of the presidency and the commander in chief we have to pay attention. Trump's "learning" of American history must have stopped even before the fifth grade. I wish I could say this is funny and not deeply disturbing. My profession should petition the President to take a one- or two-month leave of absence, VP Pence steps in for that interim, and Trump goes on a retreat in one of his resorts for forced reeducation. It could be a new tradition called the presidential education leave. Or perhaps in New Deal tradition, an 'ignorance relief' period. This alone might gain the United States again some confidence and respect around the world. God help us."

By: muhammad umar On 10:12

Continue Reading

Trump’s totally bizarre claim about avoiding the Civil War

President Trump expressed his admiration for Andrew Jackson, the seventh President of the United States, during a speech at the Hermitage on March 15. (The White House)

Why couldn't we all just get along?

That's what President Trump wants to know about the Civil War. In an interview with the Washington Examiner's Salena Zito, our president-historian posits that the war might not have happened if only Andrew Jackson had still been around. The whole thing apparently could have been avoided if only we had a bona fide negotiator — someone more up to the task than Low Energy Abe Lincoln.

Here's the exchange, which will air at 2 p.m. Monday on Sirius XM's P.O.T.U.S. station:

TRUMP: [Jackson] was a swashbuckler. But when his wife died, did you know he visited her grave every day? I visited her grave actually, because I was in Tennessee.

ZITO: Oh, that's right. You were in Tennessee.

TRUMP: And it was amazing. The people of Tennessee are amazing people. They love Andrew Jackson. They love Andrew Jackson in Tennessee.

ZITO: Yeah, he's a fascinating...

TRUMP: I mean, had Andrew Jackson been a little later, you wouldn't have had the Civil War. He was a very tough person, but he had a big heart. And he was really angry that -- he saw what was happening with regard to the Civil War. He said, “There's no reason for this.” People don't realize, you know, the Civil War — if you think about it, why? People don't ask that question, but why was there the Civil War? Why could that one not have been worked out?

One glaring issue here: Jackson wasn't really angry about what was happening with the Civil War, because he died more than a decade (1845) before it started (1861). (Jackson in 1832 and 1833 oversaw the Nullification Crisis, in which Jackson used the threat of military force to make South Carolina pay tariffs. The situation was eventually resolved but is viewed as a precursor to the Civil War.)

But that small matter aside, this actually sounds pretty familiar for Trump. Just last week, in an interview with Reuters, Trump suggested there was really no reason for the Israelis and the Palestinians to have been fighting for all these decades.

“I want to see peace with Israel and the Palestinians,” Trump said. “There is no reason there's not peace between Israel and the Palestinians — none whatsoever. So we're looking at that, and we're also looking at the potential of going to Saudi Arabia.”

No reason whatsoever! You know, besides the whole claim-to-the-very-same-holy-land thing. Minor details.

What's remarkable about this language is that it sounds like a lefty pacifist, and Trump is at the very same time talking about the prospect of a “major, major conflict” with North Korea. Apparently the Civil War and the long-standing Middle East conflict have just been lacking in diplomacy; North Korea may be beyond that.

Historians with more academic experience than Trump have indeed asked this question about the Civil War often. It's a hugely difficult one to answer, a century-and-a-half later. And to say it with the certainty Trump does — “you wouldn't have had the Civil War” with Andrew Jackson — is just foolhardy.

It's also a question that unpacks all kinds of issues with slavery. It's generally assumed that a deal to avert the Civil War would have included concessions to Southern states having to do with their right to own slaves — the central dispute of the Civil War. Is Trump saying he would have been okay with a more partial or gradual phasing out of slavery? Was there really a deal to be cut on that front? Or does he think Jackson, a slave owner himself, would have convinced the South to abandon slavery immediately, somehow?

(For a taste of Jackson's cruel attitude toward slaves, see here from the Retropolis team.)

It's also a highly questionable statement in the context of Trump's own foreign policy. If the United States does have to get involved in a foreign conflict, Trump is opening himself up to suggestions that such conflicts could have been avoided if only he were a stronger negotiator. If Middle East peace isn't attained by the time he leaves office, it will apparently be because he and adviser Jared Kushner simply weren't Andrew Jackson.

But mostly it's just a completely bizarre claim that, once again, suggests a president who speaks loudly and confidently about things he simply doesn't understand.

By: muhammad umar On 10:02

Continue Reading

Donald Trump just gave two incredibly bizarre (and fact-free) interviews

To commemorate his 100th day in office -- a "ridiculous" marker created by the "fake news" media! -- President Donald Trump gave a series of long interviews to a variety of news outlets. And, holy cow did he talk -- and talk.

Let's start with Trump's interview with "Face the Nation" host John Dickerson, the full text of which is making its way around the Internet this morning.

There's a LOT in there -- transcript is here -- but one passage stood out to me as particularly outlandish. After Trump said, "You saw what happened with surveillance," Dickerson asked the President whether he stood by his totally and completely unproven claim that then President Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower during the 2016 election -- and that Obama was a "sick" and "bad" guy for doing so.

Here's Trump's response:

"I don't stand by anything. I just-- you can take it the way you want. I think our side's been proven very strongly. And everybody's talking about it. And frankly it should be discussed. I think that is a very big surveillance of our citizens. I think it's a very big topic. And it's a topic that should be number one. And we should find out what the hell is going on."

"I don't stand by anything"!!!!!

And Trump went on. "You can take -- any way. You can take it any way you want," he told Dickerson. And then: "I have my own opinions. You can have your own opinions." Then he ended the interview.

So. Much. To. Say.

But, let's briefly touch on the other interview being released today -- with the Washington Examiner's Salena Zito and set to air on SiriusXM radio later today.

In that interview, Zito mentions Trump's visit to the Hermitage, the home of late President Andrew Jackson. Here's what happened next:

By: muhammad umar On 09:50

Continue Reading